What it breaks down to is a battle involving antiwar legislators who hope to scale back the occupation of Afghanistan by adding requirements and timetables, legislators who understand the downsides of neoliberal IMF policies and wish to make taxpayer funds hinge on policy reforms, and a White House Administration that just wants Congress to keep quiet on these hot button foreign policy decisions.
CONTACT: taylore@marlboro.edu
June 10, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Archive
-
▼
2009
(78)
-
▼
June
(30)
- "Twitter's impact inside Iran is Zero"
- Somebody is still a cynic
- Mainstream journalist speaks out on covering Pales...
- Jon Stewart, you still make me laugh
- Semantics in the War on Terror
- At least some people are enjoying themselves
- School of the Americas
- Selling the Presidency
- "Of course the U.S. has intelligence agents in Iran"
- Nice Summary on the occupation of Palestine
- What are we about to do for Russia?
- Tony Judt talks some sense
- Everyone loves a whitewash
- China and the Iranian Election
- World Oil Consumption
- False Flags Everywhere
- This was to be expected
- On the Southern Border...
- The Persians are afoot.
- More Iranian Analysis
- Watching our Billions drift away
- Total Hypocrisy
- Iranian Election Analysis
- Peace, Endless Peace
- Global Capitalism
- American "ridiculousness"
- Life in the Age of Waterboarding
- Congressional Spending, War, and the IMF
- Congressional Cover Up and War Crimes.
- Sountrack for a Russian Riot
-
▼
June
(30)
No comments:
Post a Comment